Most essays are graded by GradeFixer's experts. Our ancestors loved the idea of the death penalty, since it was a common part of life. Good Essay About The Place Of Reason. Subscribe to WowEssays Premium and get access argumentative essays on the death penalty over 1 MILLION high-quality downloadable samples GET ACCESS NOW. Since the death penalty is no longer an affected punishment, I purposed that we abolish the practice in the United States.
Works Cited
The majority of Americans have a clear and strong stance when it comes to the death penalty, no matter which side of the debate they sit on. Supporters of this punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, and that justice is being served, argumentative essays on the death penalty. My personal stance on the death penalty is that it is an outdated and ineffective punishment, serving no true benefit to society and causing more harm than good to society as a whole. When looking at the argument that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to others thinking about committing the same crime, we need only look to other countries around the world as examples to disprove this.
Throughout the world, we are able to see that, in those countries where there is no death penalty, murders and other violent crimes happen at a much lower rate than in the United States. It does seem counter-intuitive, but the evidence is clear. We can also clearly see that, in the United States, many people still commit these horrendous crimes, knowing full well that capital punishment exists. In the heat of the moment, when a person is not thinking clearly and logically, the existence of the death penalty and the possibility that they could be facing this punishment does not typically cross their mind, argumentative essays on the death penalty, and cause them to alter their behavior, argumentative essays on the death penalty. We can see this in the consistent, and increasing, number of violent crimes being committed year after year in this country.
There have also been widely publicised cases of wrongly convicted individuals, who were either put to death or were awaiting their punishment, that were revealed to be innocent. In the cases where the death penalty had already been carried out, it was too late for those innocent people. Having even one innocent person put to death wrongly is a crime unto itself. We must also look at the mental competence of the individuals being convicted and sentenced to this punishment. If a person is not argumentative essays on the death penalty capable of processing and understanding the actions they have committed, it is ethically wrong to execute them for this.
There have been advancements in the technologies being used to enact the death penalty that are designed to lessen the pain and suffering a person endures. But, in reality, the only individuals who can argumentative essays on the death penalty to their effectiveness are those being executed. We cannot say for certain whether or not someone suffered unduly while they were being executed, whether everything worked as it should to ensure a quick and painless death. And, yes, there are argumentative essays on the death penalty who will argue that a death marked by pain and suffering is a part of the justice being served. But, as we try to hold ourselves as a nation to a higher standard than our worst criminals, we should at the very least allow our justice system to work as it should, according to the Supreme Court.
And, nowhere in history has the Supreme Court ever advocated for the use of cruel and unusual punishment. We would like to think that we have more compassion and humanity than those who have committed such horrendous crimes, and as such, we should demonstrate this by showing them the humanity they denied someone else, not by sinking to their level. When we look at the evidence from around the world on the effectiveness of capital punishment as a deterrent, as well as the ethical dilemma of potentially executing innocent or mentally incompetent individuals, it is easy to see that the practice of capital punishment offers no benefits to our society. Your writing style is witty, keep up the good work! I would recommend to use this article as sample, example or for inspiration purposes.
It is already posted online and by copy-pasting it you may be flagged with plagiarism. Thank you for posting such inspiring essay. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Previous article. Next article. Your site suggests really fresh and unique content. Keep on writing, Gloria! Great, thanks for sharing this article post. Really thank you! Really Cool. Can I get supports for and against death penalty? based on religion etc. I really enjoy the post. Keep writing. great work but can you show more details for a thesis statement??
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.
save the earth essay
Having even one innocent person put to death wrongly is a crime unto itself. We must also look at the mental competence of the individuals being convicted and sentenced to this punishment. If a person is not mentally capable of processing and understanding the actions they have committed, it is ethically wrong to execute them for this. There have been advancements in the technologies being used to enact the death penalty that are designed to lessen the pain and suffering a person endures. But, in reality, the only individuals who can attest to their effectiveness are those being executed. We cannot say for certain whether or not someone suffered unduly while they were being executed, whether everything worked as it should to ensure a quick and painless death.
And, yes, there are those who will argue that a death marked by pain and suffering is a part of the justice being served. But, as we try to hold ourselves as a nation to a higher standard than our worst criminals, we should at the very least allow our justice system to work as it should, according to the Supreme Court. And, nowhere in history has the Supreme Court ever advocated for the use of cruel and unusual punishment. We would like to think that we have more compassion and humanity than those who have committed such horrendous crimes, and as such, we should demonstrate this by showing them the humanity they denied someone else, not by sinking to their level.
When we look at the evidence from around the world on the effectiveness of capital punishment as a deterrent, as well as the ethical dilemma of potentially executing innocent or mentally incompetent individuals, it is easy to see that the practice of capital punishment offers no benefits to our society. Your writing style is witty, keep up the good work! I would recommend to use this article as sample, example or for inspiration purposes. It is already posted online and by copy-pasting it you may be flagged with plagiarism. Thank you for posting such inspiring essay. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Previous article. Next article. Your site suggests really fresh and unique content. When placing the idea of an eye for an eye on various crimes is seems extreme and unnecessary.
A life for a life is excessive. Criminals do forfeit some rights to life, but not all rights to life. Punishments will happen for individuals committing these crimes, but there are punishments that fit the crimes being committed. For example, life in prison with no possibility of parole fits the punishment of first degree murder. The principle of human dignity directly goes directly against the element of reciprocity. The element of reciprocity explains that we can forfeit our rights by our own actions. The human dignity argument has the idea that human dignity should always be reserved. Human rights are given to an individual when born should be modified when committing crimes but never forfeited. Individuals should never lose their respect for human dignity.
Good or bad actions, all humans have emotions and can feel pain; at somewhat the same level. Individuals who do not agree with the principle of human dignity are in support of the death penalty. There are many factors that morality support the death penalty. Supports are in favor of taking the life of someone who committed a horrendous crime; a life for a life. Individuals who do not agree with the human dignity argument may attempt to argue that the death penalty is an effective consequence because it deters other criminals from committing the crimes. Continuing, it may be argued that the death penalty can show society its moral outrage at unpleasant crimes. Resulting in a decrease in the crime rates. Although this seems efficient, an individual who commits a crime already knowing the consequences.
Life in prison with no possible chance of parole is enough to deter an individual of a crime who does not want to seek punishment. Other supporters of the death penalty derive more from government than society. The government is considerably more in favor of the death penalty because of the costs. This argument is important to the government because it saves the government more money. Morally, this is the most incorrect argument regarding the death penalty. No amount of money is equivalent to the life of a human being. The death penalty is the wrong consequence more many reasons. Although, individuals are rarely put to death for crimes they did not commit, it does happen.
To avoid wrongfully killing an individual for a crime they did not commit, the death penalty should not be used a punishment. Technology continues to advance every day. Scientist are figuring out new technology and experiments as we speak. If new advances in technology regarding the criminal justice system were to be discovered and the death penalty was not implemented, an individual would gain their rights and freedom back. A wrongfully committed individual can be released from prison, not brought back to life.
Not all, but some crimes can be justified. The death penalty is such a controversial topic there will never be a correct answer. The arguments are all based on morals and views. Although there is no correct answer, there is a better answer. The human dignity argument gives all humans, equal rights; regardless is one made a criminal mistake or not. All humans have human dignity. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. According to Berman there were several officials begging for them to change the pace of executions because it imposes stress and trauma Berman.
This proves that carrying out several executions can take a severe toll on correction officers wellbeing. This proves that when working as a correction officer and you have to execute people it can be very traumatic and hard to get over which causes stress. Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it is extremely expensive.
No comments:
Post a Comment